From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:46:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t7003: Use test_commit instead of custom function
Message-ID: <AANLkTikqGLvMHzsa4We7OUcYz5o2v62huO1OhiYLPHeS@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1009131741270.2439@intel-tinevez-2-302>

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 15:44, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 15:24, Brian Gernhardt
>> <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com> wrote:
>> > On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In addition, why do we need a custom make_commit when we have
>> > test_commit in test-lib.sh?
>>
>> It was added in v1.5.3-rc0~69^2~10 by Johannes Schindelin (CC'd). It's
>> probably just now-needless duplication, but I haven't familirized myself
>> with the code.
>
> Yep, I did not make a cleanup patch after adding test_commit. Neither did
> I consolidate other cases in t/ where the steps are done explicitly.

Thanks. I didn't check when test_commit was added, it makes sense now.

There's a lot of old spiderwebs like that in t/* that could now use
cleanup.