From: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:38:02 GMT
Subject: Re: RFC: what should git rev-parse --flags HEAD do?
Message-ID: <AANLkTikW=4NiZ_jCq6geqta_XHiWJPUhWvvEtJ1Q3G9S@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vfwwxogiv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Perhaps you are missing --no-revs.
> ...

> "--flags" is an afterthought that filters out non-flags in other parts; I
> do not think it applied to the "rev" part (i.e. giving --no-revs at the
> same time would be a valid workaround if you know you do not want HEAD or
> any revision traversal argument) in any released version of git.
>

i am aware that --no-revs exists and can be used with --flags to
ensure that only flag arguments are displayed.

The issue is that the documentation currently implies that --flags
alone is sufficient to suppress anything that is not a flag when this
is not, in fact, the case.

If there is some reason --flags should not imply --no-revs, then the
documentation should be updated to state:

--flags::