From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:59:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] Convert ce_path_match() to use struct pathspec
Message-ID: <AANLkTikKCU==mS5_TdqHstETj=CQ_deHMCJ4xW0r+Sck@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v39pxl10y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

2010/12/17 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
>> index 3b809f2..63db7f4 100644
>> --- a/diff-lib.c
>> +++ b/diff-lib.c
>> @@ -89,9 +89,11 @@ int run_diff_files(struct rev_info *revs, unsigned int option)
>>       int silent_on_removed = option & DIFF_SILENT_ON_REMOVED;
>>       unsigned ce_option = ((option & DIFF_RACY_IS_MODIFIED)
>>                             ? CE_MATCH_RACY_IS_DIRTY : 0);
>> +     struct pathspec pathspec;
>>
>>       diff_set_mnemonic_prefix(&revs->diffopt, "i/", "w/");
>>
>> +     init_pathspec(&pathspec, revs->prune_data);
>
> I wonder if it makes more sense to change the type of revs->prune_data
> from an array of pointers to strings to a pointer to struct pathspec.
> Is there a downside?

Converting a pointer to another pointer means mis typecasting can
happen and the compiler won't help catching them. I thinking of
changing prune_data to simply struct pathspec. Looks like it breaks
thing.. hm...
-- 
Duy