From: Stephen Boyd Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:36:38 GMT Subject: Re: git send-email doesn't take To: addresses from the patch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4C7E1537.9030405@st.com> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:56 AM, viresh kumar wrote: > On 9/1/2010 1:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] send-email: Use To: headers in patch files >> >> It's a minor annoyance when you take the painstaking time to setup To: >> headers for each patch in a large series, and then go out to send the >> series with git-send-email and watch git ignore the To: headers in the >> patch files. >> >> Therefore, always add To: headers from a patch file to the To: headers >> for that message. Keep the prompt for the blanket To: header so as to >> not break scripts (and user expectations). This means even if a patch has a >> To: header, git will prompt for the To: address. Otherwise, we'll need to >> introduce interface breakage to either request the header for each patch >> missing a To: header or default the header to whatever To: address is found >> first (be it in a patch or from user input). Both of these options don't seem >> very obvious/useful. >> >> Reported-by: viresh kumar >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > > Tested-by: Viresh Kumar > Cool. Junio, does this look good to you? I can squash in some tests later tonight if I get some git time.