From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:06:08 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Docs: git tag
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wEp40mx=g=MhUYSjJN=cF+H+GEvbFyaV_yrot@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v8vvzyvdi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:04, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Small patches fixing up the `git tag' docs.
>>
>> Michael Witten (10):
>>   Docs: git tag: Add `the'
>>   Docs: git tag: peoples back -> people's backs
>>   Docs: git tag: Revise a paragraph.
>>   Docs: git tag: other's -> the other person's
>>   Docs: git tag: Streamline a sentence.
>>   Docs: git tag: Add missing 'the'
>>   Docs: git tag: Use 'who' again
>>   Docs: git tag: Remove superfluous 'with'
>>   Docs: git tag: Use semicolon
>>   Docs: git tag: Rewrite discussion of GIT_COMMITTER_DATE
>
> Thanks; all looked sensible changes, except for 7/10 which I somehow find
> the original is more readable than the new text, partly because the
> sentences are shorter but more importantly because the two sentences make
> two separate assertions (the first is about what "one-shot" pull means,
> the second is about why automatic tag following is not desired in that
> situation).

Fair enough.