From: Giuseppe Bilotta Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:52:23 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] gitweb: git_get_heads_list accepts an optional list of refs. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201009170014.12483.jnareb@gmail.com> 2010/9/17 Jakub Narebski : > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > >> git_get_heads_list(limit, class1, class2, ...) can now be used to retrieve >> refs/class1, refs/class2 etc. Defaults to ('heads') or ('heads', 'remotes') >> depending on the remote_heads option. > > I like this API very much. Thank you. >> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta >> --- >>  gitweb/gitweb.perl |   11 +++++++---- >>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl >> index 7116c26..21e83bb 100755 >> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl >> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl >> @@ -3155,15 +3155,18 @@ sub parse_from_to_diffinfo { >>  ## parse to array of hashes functions >> >>  sub git_get_heads_list { >> -     my $limit = shift; >> +     my ($limit, @class) = @_; > > Nitpick: @class or @classes. Right, the general gitweb style is for plural for arrays. >> +     unless (defined @class) { >> +             my $remote_heads = gitweb_check_feature('remote_heads'); >> +             @class = ('heads', $remote_heads ? 'remotes' : undef); > > Same comment as for previous patch: > >  +             @class = ('heads', $remote_heads ? 'remotes' : ()); > > Or alternative solution: > >  +             @class = 'heads'; >  +             push @class, 'remotes' if gitweb_check_feature('remote_heads'); > I like the () solution better. Less verbosity >>       my @headslist; >> >> -     my $remote_heads = gitweb_check_feature('remote_heads'); >> - >>       open my $fd, '-|', git_cmd(), 'for-each-ref', >>               ($limit ? '--count='.($limit+1) : ()), '--sort=-committerdate', >>               '--format=%(objectname) %(refname) %(subject)%00%(committer)', >> -             'refs/heads', ( $remote_heads ? 'refs/remotes' : '') >> +             @refs > > Nitpick: it is called '...' in git-for-each-ref manpage... I'm not particularly enamoured with @refs, so @patterns it is (if I get what you mean here) -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta