From: Jon Seymour Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:44:41 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] git stash branch fixes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hi, does anyone see any reason why this series could not be a candidate for merging into next or master? If there is some reason for me to re-post it, let me know. Regards, jon. On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jon Seymour wrote: > | fixed the subject line - sorry ! > > This series fixes git stash branch so that it is more tolerant of > stash-like commits created with git stash create. > > It particular, it doesn't require there to be a stash stack if a > stash-like argument is specified and it doesn't attempt to drop > non-stash references after applying the stash. > > This series replaces my previous patch that just included a test > that demonstrated the existance of the issue. > >  stash: It looks like a stash, but doesn't quack like a stash... >  stash: Allow git stash branch to process commits that look like >    stashes but are not stash references. >  stash: modify tests to reflect stash branch fixes. > >  git-stash.sh     |   10 ++++++++-- >  t/t3903-stash.sh |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.2.1.111.g8fc90 > > >