From: Carl Fürstenberg Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:06:31 GMT Subject: Re: Git submodule update and the --merge flag when submodule is yet to be checked out Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vipvgw3c1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> 2011/3/18 Junio C Hamano : > Carl Fürstenberg writes: > >> Sorry for re-posting the question but I though I should explain the >> issue better and to fix the subject line. >> sub >> When you are cloning repository containing submodules, and you are >> using the --merge flag to "git submodule update" the first time, then >> the submodule instance in question will assume you want to delete all >> files present in the module. > > Is this something we fixed last month? > > commit 1b4735d9f3e0b7ea62c7c22f0afcb45e10c46c7e > Author: Spencer E. Olson > Date:   Thu Feb 17 09:18:45 2011 -0700 > >    submodule: no [--merge|--rebase] when newly cloned > >    "git submodule update" can be run with either the "--merge" or "--rebase" >    option, or submodule..update configuration variable can be set to >    "merge" or "rebase, to cause local work to get integrated when updating >    the submodule. > >    When a submodule is newly cloned, however, it does not have a check out >    when a rebase or merge is attempted, leading to a failure.  For newly >    cloned submodules, simply check out the appropriate revision.  There is no >    local work to integrate with for them. > >    Signed-off-by: Spencer E. Olson >    Acked-by: Jens Lehmann >    Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Ah, I see, thank you, I was using 1.7.4 and I assume this is for next. -- Carl Fürstenberg