From: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 19:09:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] Add --format to tag verification
Message-ID: <9ec55b69-ddd7-ebee-96e3-120422578592@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kZ+eETHm2xuorRqP9OPKdETZSOuuY+SWPR_=J6MwJedRg@mail.gmail.com>

W dniu 22.09.2016 o 21:01, Stefan Beller pisze:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM,  <santiago@nyu.edu> wrote:
> 
>>
>> P.S. Gmane seems to be broken for git after it was rebooted. Should we ping
>> them about it?
> 
> I think most of the git developers have moved on and reference emails by
> message id. An archive of all messages of the mailing list is found at
> 
>     public-inbox.org/git/
> 
> (You can git-clone it to have a distributed copy of the whole archive)
> 
>     public-inbox.org/git/<message-id>/
>     public-inbox.org/git/<message-id>/raw
> 
> is a good point to link to.
> 
> However, feel free to ping gmane. :)

Two relevant articles are the following:
 [1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/695695/
 [2]: https://lwn.net/Articles/699704/

In short: Gmane creator and maintainer wanted to retire from being
maintainer[1] because of DDoS attack against its web interface, so he
stopped supporting wen interface (NNTP continues working). Thus
public-inbox.org was created (or just advertised more). Later
Gmane got new maintainer[2], but without code for web interface
(I don't know why it is).

So there is hope that Gmane web interface would be up some time in
the future; in meantime one can use public-inbox URLs.

HTH,
-- 
Jakub Narębski