From: Pazu <pazu@pazu.com.br>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:36:51 GMT
Subject: Re: Ignoring local changes
Message-ID: <9e7ab7380612141336p3b930047l3a4a76947239162f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4581C1D4.7080102@dawes.za.net>

2006/12/14, Rogan Dawes <discard@dawes.za.net>:

> Why not remove it from the repo, then set .gitignore?
>
> If it is generated code, or compiled code, it probably shouldn't be in
> the repo in the first place . . . Simply correct that mistake, and you
> are good to go.

Basically, because I don't want to mess with the upstream. I know, I
can remove them only from my local branch, and never push the commit
that removed the files, and that's what I'll probably do if there's no
other way -- but it would be best if I could just ignore the files. It
doesn't sound unreasonable, does it?