From: Richard Hansen <hansenr@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 22:01:22 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] diff: document behavior of relative diff.orderFile
Message-ID: <9daa70e4-82b0-a82a-67b9-e893546638a7@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqziiyr7e9.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 2017-01-10 15:23, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Richard Hansen <hansenr@google.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2017-01-10 01:58, Jeff King wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> What happens in a bare repository?
>>>>
>>>> I'm guessing it's relative to the top-level of the repository,
>>>
>>> I just tried it out and it's relative to $PWD.
>>
>> That is understandable.  When the user says
>>
>>     $ cmd -O $file
>>
>> with any option -O that takes a filename, it is most natural if we
>> used $PWD/$file when $file is not absolute path.
>
> Ahh, ignore me in the above.  The discussion is about the
> configuration variable, and I agree that being relative to GIT_DIR
> would have made more sense.  In fact taking it as relative to PWD
> does not make any sense.

I'll stay silent regarding bare repositories then.

>
> We should have been a lot more careful when we added 6d8940b562
> ("diff: add diff.orderfile configuration variable", 2013-12-18), but
> it is too late to complain now.
>
> A related tangent.
>
> I wonder if anything that uses git_config_pathname() should be
> relative to GIT_DIR when it is not absolute.

I think so.  (For bare repositories anyway; non-bare should be relative 
to GIT_WORK_TREE.)  Perhaps git_config_pathname() itself should convert 
relative paths to absolute so that every pathname setting automatically 
works without changing any calling code.

-Richard