From: Jeff Hostetler Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 20:17:20 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] json_writer: new routines to create data in JSON format Message-ID: <9cfabdad-e4eb-a334-5e6c-aad6dfee8b87@jeffhostetler.com> In-Reply-To: On 6/7/2018 1:24 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:12 AM, wrote: >> Add a series of jw_ routines and "struct json_writer" structure to compose >> JSON data. The resulting string data can then be output by commands wanting >> to support a JSON output format. >> [...] >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler >> --- >> diff --git a/t/t0019-json-writer.sh b/t/t0019-json-writer.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ >> +test_expect_success 'simple object' ' >> + cat >expect <<-\EOF && >> + {"a":"abc","b":42,"c":3.14,"d":true,"e":false,"f":null} >> + EOF >> + test-json-writer >actual \ >> + @object \ >> + @object-string a abc \ >> + @object-int b 42 \ >> + @object-double c 2 3.140 \ >> + @object-true d \ >> + @object-false e \ >> + @object-null f \ >> + @end && >> + test_cmp expect actual >> +' > > To make it easier on people writing these tests, it might be nice for > this to be less noisy by getting rid of "@" and "\". To get rid of > "\", the test program could grab its script commands from stdin (one > instruction per line) rather than from argv[]. For instance: > > test-json-writer >actual <<-\EOF && > object > object-string a abc > ... > end > EOF > > Not a big deal, and certainly not worth a re-roll. > I hadn't thought about doing it that way. Might be a little easier to use. Let me take a look and see if it would be much work to switch. Thanks Jeff