From: Jaydeep Das <jaydeepjd.8914@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 10:45:06 GMT
Subject: Re: A new feature command request `cmd_ignore`
Message-ID: <9a3837b4-8c67-e114-e977-f6c7b729ba45@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f6f1dba-a923-4bb9-70a7-4936566f46e0@kdbg.org>


> I think that is a paraphrase of the suggestion to

    git rm --cached settings
    echo settings >> .gitignore

> when changes to a file 'settings' that was already tracked (and often
> contains user-specific settings) should be ignored. This misguided and
> short-sighted "solution" is repeated numerous times on Stackoverflow.
> Not something that we should encourage.

So what should be done in this scenario? And why is it a discouraged and 
misguided thing?


On 1/15/22 14:33, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 15.01.22 um 06:17 schrieb Elijah Newren:
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 3:03 PM Jaydeep Das <jaydeepjd.8914@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> and other parameters like `--force`
>>> could be added which would delete that file cache if that
>>> file was already committed.
>> I don't understand what you mean by this.
> I think that is a paraphrase of the suggestion to
>
>     git rm --cached settings
>     echo settings >> .gitignore
>
> when changes to a file 'settings' that was already tracked (and often
> contains user-specific settings) should be ignored. This misguided and
> short-sighted "solution" is repeated numerous times on Stackoverflow.
> Not something that we should encourage.
>
> -- Hannes