From: Wincent Colaiuta Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:11:27 GMT Subject: Re: [cogito-0.18.2] Documentation/Code Mismatch: cg-switch -l Message-ID: <998860CC-E94E-4C61-964A-0CB9F44074C1@wincent.com> In-Reply-To: <20080527080417.GA32209@lifebook.rekudos.net> El 27/5/2008, a las 10:04, Mark Lawrence escribió: >> On Mon May 26, 2008 at 02:19:04PM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: >>> Mark Lawrence wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I don't know if this is a bug or just my understanding, but I'm >>>> having >>>> trouble matching the behaviour of "cg-switch -l" with the >>>> documentation. >>>> >>> >>> Cogito became officially unmaintained a very long time ago (late >>> 2006?) >>> and will almost certainly not work properly with any half-recent >>> version >>> of git. Don't use it. >> >> Oh. That's only slightly annoying to learn now, >> given >> that I've spent the past two years learning and converting my >> projects >> over to cogito :/ Could somebody *please* update the cogito web >> page at >> http://git.or.cz/cogito/ and put a big (maybe even blinking) notice >> informing people of this? >> >> Bit of a shame that it's died though, because I appreciated the >> simpler >> interface (and some of the output I find nicer). >> >> On a more practical note, am I likely to suffer any issues using pure >> git on repos created with cogito? > > And a related question: is there any kind of cogito replacement that > provides a simplified interface? As far as versioning tools go, git is > quite low-level... The reason why cogito fell out of maintenance is that git itself has evolved from the hard-core, close-to-the-metal tool that it was in the early days to be usable by mere mortals. What specific features/ workflows of cogito are you missing? It's likely that modern git already has an equivalent that is just as easy to use. Wincent