From: Felipe Contreras Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:57:26 GMT Subject: Re: Git weekly news: 2008-49 Message-ID: <94a0d4530812051357m4f0bc591n802c41a78e698b3b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Santi Béjar wrote: > 2008/12/5 Felipe Contreras : >> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > [...] > >>>> But here are the links anyway. The order is rather random. >>> >>> Moreover the _quality_ of those links is very random. >> >> Exactly, I didn't choose them, that's what people have been tagging as >> "git" in delicious.com. I'm subscribed to the RSS feed and saving the >> ones that appear a lot. >> >> In fact I don't like some of them, but that's what the "public" finds >> interesting. > > So I don't see the value of such a list. You can go to delicious and > get it. Try it. You can't see which ones are new, which are completely irrelevant. There are duplicates and you can't see the popularity / freshness ratio, or "hotness", never mind the most popular this week. Apparently some people already found interesting links they haven't seen before, so at lest there's value for them. > Another thing that could be great is filtering this list to > those that pass a certain criteria (mainly quality, up to date, ...) > and present it in an attractive way, with summaries, categorized by > type (trick, tutorial, comparison,...), ... Yes, I'll probably improve the presentation. -- Felipe Contreras