From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 23:19:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Unconfuse git clone when two branches at are HEAD.
Message-ID: <94A71512041A4F9BB402474DB385E310@PhilipOakley>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfvthyfui.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> "Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
>
>> Does this have any impact on the alleged bug in `git bundle --all`
>> (which can then be cloned from) where the current HEAD ref wasn't
>> included in the bundle? Or am I mis-remembering?
>
> Not "current HEAD ref", but "git clone" will fail to check out from
> a bundle that does not include HEAD ref (it is easy to just say
> "reset --hard master" or whatever after it, though).
>
> I think I suggested to update "git bundle" to include HEAD when
> there is no HEAD specified some time ago, but I do not think anybody
> was interested, so this may be a non-issue.
>
Just had a quick look at a very quick test repo (10 objects, 2 branches) 
and the bundle file does contain the HEAD ref, but again it has the two 
ref/heads/* are better than one problem, in that the clone from the 
bundle checks out master, whilst the source repo has feature checked 
out.

Philip