From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 18:31:27 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci(dockerized): do show the result of failing tests again
Message-ID: <920c302c-5d36-d5fe-7f19-28a1eb905a19@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsee1rjyx.fsf@gitster.g>

Hi Junio,

On Tue, 25 Nov 2025, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2025, Elijah Newren wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 9:17 AM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
> >> <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> >> >
> >> > The quality of tests/test suites does not show as much when there are no
> >> > breakages as in the amount of time required after bugs trigger test
> >> > failures before the bugs can be identified, analyzed and resolved.
> >> 
> >> I found this paragraph hard to parse.  After re-reading a couple
> >> times, does the following convey the same meaning?:
> >> 
> >> The quality of tests and test suites is most apparent not when
> >> everything passes, but in how quickly bugs can be identified,
> >> analyzed, and resolved after test failures occur.
> >
> > Yes, this reflects what I tried to say.
> 
> So, do you mind if I locally amended the log message, or should we
> expect an updated patch sent to the list?  For a small thing like
> this, either is fine by me.

Sure, I saw that you amended the log message and also changed the `chmod`
to be a bit more robust.

Ciao,
Johannes