From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:50:46 GMT Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Actually use retval Message-ID: <91afab0d46939238dd7c90ea2902b02cae083316.1300798069.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: This is most likely a bug. Nocited by gcc 4.6.0. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin --- Alternatively, retval's declaration and assignment can go. tree-diff.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/tree-diff.c b/tree-diff.c index 3954281..9e2dc70 100644 --- a/tree-diff.c +++ b/tree-diff.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int compare_tree_entry(struct tree_desc *t1, struct tree_desc *t2, opt->change(opt, mode1, mode2, sha1, sha2, base->buf, 0, 0); } strbuf_setlen(base, old_baselen); - return 0; + return retval; } /* A whole sub-tree went away or appeared */ -- 1.7.4.msysgit.0.167.ge91fd