From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:30:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 5)
Message-ID: <90edb162-e035-bdb7-a2d2-ffc6bd075977@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200429195035.GB3920@syl.local>

Am 29.04.20 um 21:50 schrieb Taylor Blau:
> This comment has nothing to do with your series, but I am curious if you
> are planning on touching 'test_might_fail' at all. These can be useful
> for non-Git commands, too, such as 'test_might_fail umask 022' on
> systems that may or may not do something sensible with umask.

When it's not a git command that might fail, the idiom is

	... &&
	{ umask 022 || :; } &&
	...

-- Hannes