From: Philip Oakley Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:21:45 GMT Subject: Re: Suggestions for "What's cooking" Message-ID: <90925598F9104F7FAC680544FABE0A79@PhilipOakley> In-Reply-To: From: "Philip Oakley" Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:49 PM > From: "Jens Lehmann" > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:21 PM >> Am 11.09.2012 21:41, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >>> Thanks. I wish all others paid attention to "What's cooking" like >>> you did here. >>> >>> And if it is hard to do so for whatever reason, suggest a better way >>> for me to publish "What's cooking" or an equivalent (I am interested >>> in finding the least bureaucratic way to help people and keep the >>> balls rolling). >> >> I think "What's cooking" makes lots of sense in its current form >> as one gets a very good overview over current development tracks. >> >> Maybe in addition it would be nice to email the author(s) of a >> series when the state changes or new comments are added (and to >> only include the relevant part from "What's cooking" there). For >> me it's not a big problem as I just have to grep for "submodule" >> to get the bits I care about, but I suspect others might have to >> invest much more time to check the current state of their series >> and may appreciate being mailed directly when something happens. >> Opinions? > > My comment, as a simple reader, is that I misread the order of the > items, in that I miss-associate the description paragraph with the * > title _below_. That is, I see the description first and then read > on... > > Thinking about it, if the description paragraph was indented by one > space then the * title would create that obvious content indent that > (I am) would be expected. > > Obviously only a useful suggestion if it's easy to implement... > > Philip Thinking overnight. One very simple option is to just add a double line spacing between items to give a clearer break. i.e. previous item ends.LF LF LF * Next Item