From: Phillip Wood Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 09:51:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] run-command API: don't fall back on online_cpus() Message-ID: <8f95fbdb-b211-56af-8693-0e5a84afebac@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 30/09/2022 12:28, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > When a "jobs = 0" is passed let's BUG() out rather than fall back on > online_cpus(). Why? It seems like a useful default behavior. > The default behavior was added when this API was > implemented in c553c72eed6 (run-command: add an asynchronous parallel > child processor, 2015-12-15). > > Most of our code in-tree that scales up to "online_cpus()" by default > calls that function by itself. By having these callers of the > "run_processes_parallel()" API do the same we can in subsequent > commits pass all arguments down as a "const struct". This is not convincing, you can have a function with a const struct interface that sets the number of jobs by doing f(const struct *pp) { struct pp mutable; if (!pp->n) { mutable = *pp; mutable.n = online_cpus(); pp = &mutable; } ... } I'm not convinced by the reasoning given for removing the default behavior Best Wishes Phillip > The preceding commit has an overview of the API callers that passed > "jobs = 0". There were only two of them (actually three, but they > resolved to these two config parsing codepaths). > > The "fetch.parallel" caller already had a test for the > "fetch.parallel=0" case added in 0353c688189 (fetch: do not run a > redundant fetch from submodule, 2022-05-16), but there was no such > test for "submodule.fetchJobs". Let's add one here. > > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > --- > builtin/fetch.c | 2 ++ > run-command.c | 6 +++--- > submodule-config.c | 2 ++ > t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh | 5 +++++ > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c > index 78043fb67ef..82f1da14ec1 100644 > --- a/builtin/fetch.c > +++ b/builtin/fetch.c > @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static int git_fetch_config(const char *k, const char *v, void *cb) > fetch_parallel_config = git_config_int(k, v); > if (fetch_parallel_config < 0) > die(_("fetch.parallel cannot be negative")); > + if (!fetch_parallel_config) > + fetch_parallel_config = online_cpus(); > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c > index 80d282dbdb6..1a604af14fb 100644 > --- a/run-command.c > +++ b/run-command.c > @@ -1568,8 +1568,8 @@ static void pp_init(struct parallel_processes *pp, > { > unsigned int i; > > - if (jobs < 1) > - jobs = online_cpus(); > + if (!jobs) > + BUG("you must provide a non-zero number of jobs!"); > > pp->max_processes = jobs; > > @@ -1843,7 +1843,7 @@ void run_processes_parallel_tr2(unsigned int jobs, get_next_task_fn get_next_tas > const char *tr2_category, const char *tr2_label) > { > trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d", > - ((jobs < 1) ? online_cpus() : jobs)); > + jobs); > > run_processes_parallel(jobs, get_next_task, start_failure, > task_finished, pp_cb); > diff --git a/submodule-config.c b/submodule-config.c > index cd7ee236a12..4dc61b3a78a 100644 > --- a/submodule-config.c > +++ b/submodule-config.c > @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ int parse_submodule_fetchjobs(const char *var, const char *value) > int fetchjobs = git_config_int(var, value); > if (fetchjobs < 0) > die(_("negative values not allowed for submodule.fetchJobs")); > + if (!fetchjobs) > + fetchjobs = online_cpus(); > return fetchjobs; > } > > diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh > index e36f9fdf242..98a287ffb90 100755 > --- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh > +++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh > @@ -724,6 +724,11 @@ test_expect_success 'fetching submodules respects parallel settings' ' > GIT_TRACE=$(pwd)/trace.out git fetch --jobs 9 && > grep "9 tasks" trace.out && > >trace.out && > + > + GIT_TRACE=$(pwd)/trace.out git -c submodule.fetchJobs=0 fetch && > + grep "preparing to run up to [0-9]* tasks" trace.out && > + ! grep "up to 0 tasks" trace.out && > + >trace.out > ) > ' >