From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 13:13:09 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] sequencer: finish parsing the todo list despite an invalid first line
Message-ID: <8e38a723-9fda-2d76-c767-7b76cb428a73@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230721060848.35641-1-alexhenrie24@gmail.com>

On 21/07/2023 07:07, Alex Henrie wrote:
> Changes from v3:
> - Rebase onto HEAD~4 instead of --root (which was the original motivation
>    for sending a new patch and I forgot to include that change; I probably
>    shouldn't be doing Git development late at night...)

Please don't feel that you have to re-roll straight away when someone 
reviews your patch - it's fine to wait a while if you're busy. Also if 
you disagree with some of the reviewer's comments it can be helpful to 
wait for them to respond before sending a new version in order to try 
and reach a consensus about the best way forward.

Best Wishes

Phillip

> Alex Henrie (1):
>    sequencer: finish parsing the todo list despite an invalid first line
> 
>   sequencer.c                   |  2 +-
>   t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Range-diff against v3:
> 1:  b1af2df3f5 ! 1:  f6fcdcd9a9 sequencer: finish parsing the todo list despite an invalid first line
>      @@ t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh: test_expect_success 'static check of bad command'
>       +	rebase_setup_and_clean fixup-first &&
>       +	(
>       +		set_fake_editor &&
>      -+		test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES="fixup 1 2 3 4 5" \
>      -+			       git rebase -i --root 2>actual &&
>      ++		test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES="fixup 1 2 3 4" \
>      ++			       git rebase -i HEAD~4 2>actual &&
>       +		grep "cannot .fixup. without a previous commit" actual &&
>       +		grep "You can fix this with .git rebase --edit-todo.." actual &&
>       +		grep -v "^#" .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo >orig &&