From: Lars Hjemli Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:57:47 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add --dry-run option to git-push Message-ID: <8c5c35580710110057r29c1fe0w7f9e2825fa33@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2faad3050710101634s5ed39bcbn723184810bc265d5@mail.gmail.com> On 10/11/07, Baz wrote: > there was discussion recently about the default behaviour of git-push > having the potential to confuse, making it easy to push commits that > are still cooking in other branches. > > Its also possible for newbies to make mistakes with refspecs, but > there's no way to know if you've got the syntax right without actually > pushing. Steffan suggested a dry-run flag, which I've always wanted > too, so here's an attempt. Patches git-send-pack, git-push, their > docs, and adds a test for git-push. Maybe some of this description could be reused in the commit messages? > first patch to the list and the mailer will > probably mangle it (sigh) Yeah, it did. Would it be possible for you to resend with git-send-email after adding proper commit messages? If git-send-email is not an option, attaching the patches are preferable to the current mangling. -- larsh