From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:13:56 GMT
Subject: Re: git new features: following and priority branches with new git flow
Message-ID: <8bcfe2fe-3522-413f-b4d1-13e048028296@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKRouPtDrCgUk1bQeF+ao04rtK_jg8KxD6Oju8vw8H-ZYt-7Ow@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025, at 11:15, Milos Markovic wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> After decades of using git (as dev, as manager and as a cto), and
> considering different git flows I noticed some gaps.
>
> Briefly, different git flows perceive branches equally and shape
> history from developers perspective. I realized that if the
> perspective is written from a devops perspective ( focusing on higher
> priority branches, like prod first , than qa, and with least focus on
> dev) the source history could be organized differently ( from my
> perspective a bit better). We used the following approach for a couple
> of years.
>
> Therefore I invite you to check the following workflow here
> https://github.com/k4hvd1/rebaser-flow .
>
> It would be my pleasure to discuss new features in git and how this
> approach could be used. Finally if it makes sense for you I will show
> you other materials and we could think about implementing it in git .
>
> Regards
> Milos

Those `gitscript.sh` should be shell functions. They will not work
unless your default shell is Bash.

E.g.

    git config --global alias.pld  '![[ $(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD) == "dev" ]] && git fetch --all &&  git rebase origin/dev && git rebase origin/qa && git rebase origin/production'