From: Santi Béjar Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 20:28:52 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit: Show committer if automatic Message-ID: <8aa486160805031328o7dfae18fnac1bbea7420e0193@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7vmyn7tezi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Santi Béjar writes: [...] > > > static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix) > > { > > struct stat statbuf; > > @@ -448,6 +471,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix) > > const char *hook_arg2 = NULL; > > const char *author_ident; > > const char *committer_ident; > > + int showed_ident = 0; > > > > if (!no_verify && run_hook(index_file, "pre-commit", NULL)) > > return 0; > > @@ -528,6 +552,7 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix) > > strbuf_release(&sb); > > > > determine_author_info(); > > + git_committer_info(0); > > This call needs a comment to justify it, as it feels wrong to call a > function that usually is used for its return string and discard the return > value. In the code or in the commit message. /* To know if the committer ident is automatic */ I did it this way to have the knowledge about the automatic setting in git_committer_info. > > > > @@ -558,11 +583,20 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char *index_file, const char *prefix) > > getenv("GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL"))); > > if (strcmp(author_ident, committer_ident)) > > fprintf(fp, > > - "#\n" > > - "# Author: %s\n" > > - "#\n", > > + "%s" > > + "# Author: %s\n", > > + showed_ident++ ? "" : "#\n", > > fmt_name(author_name, author_email)); > > This part should have been [0/2] as it has been agreed it is a good idea. Sorry, I should have said to this series was on top of: [PATCHv2 2/3] commit: Show author if different from committer I'll send a series with this include and the corrections. Santi