From: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:35 GMT
Subject: Re: Wishlist for a bundle-only transport mode
Message-ID: <8aa486160711210815g5a1973c2see28a6263fc56030@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711211554370.27959@racer.site>

On Nov 21, 2007 4:59 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
>
> > 1) git-clone does not accept a bundle file, even if git-fetch does. I've
> > made a patch to use git-fetch in git-clone for this.
>
> This, along with rewriting git-clone as a very thin wrapper over git-init,
> -remote and -fetch, is a really low hanging fruit.

For the basic/normal mode it can be a very thin wrapper but you have
to support --local, --shared, --reference...

> > 2) The bundles created with "git bundle" does not record the HEAD, they
> > resolve the symbolic name to a branch name.
>
> It imitates ls-remote output.

No, it does not.

With a newly created project with one commit:

$ git ls-remote git.git
b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf        HEAD
b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf        refs/heads/master

$ git bundle create git.bdl HEAD master

$ git bundle list-heads git.bdl
b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf refs/heads/master
b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf refs/heads/master

Santi