From: Joel Mahoney Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:02:45 GMT Subject: Re: fatal: bad revision 'HEAD' Message-ID: <89456E84-1A85-4D0C-9643-C191EE877E61@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090813043855.GA21158@coredump.intra.peff.net> Hello, I'm not sure I completely understand where you guys are at with this thread : - ) but I thought I would mention that the question arose from my inability to install a plugin into a Ruby on Rails project based on my having (unknowingly) set branch.master.rebase = true. I bring this up because a lot of people are getting their first exposure to git through Rails/github, and installing plugins in Rails is (I think) a good example of brining an existing history (the plugin) into a separate repository (your project). and because this maneuver is built into the "./script/plugin install" action, it is not something that cannot be easily customized. again, I may be a little off track here, but I thought I would remind you of the original context for what that is worth : - ) thanks again for your help! Joel On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:36:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I honestly do not know of a sane reason (other than "because I can") >> anybody would want to _start_ a new root in a repository with an >> existing >> history. And doing a "pull" with or without --rebase immediately >> after >> starting a new root is doubly insane, as you say. > > IIRC, the reason I did it was to throw away history, starting a new > root > at the current state. Which is at least a little bit sane, though I > think I might just do it with a graft and filter-branch these days. > >> But that is the kind of "ending up to have" I am talking about; it >> is not >> something you _aim to_ create on purpose. If you want to _start_ a >> separate history, and if you are sane, you would start the separate >> history in a separate repository. > > Agreed. Let's not worry about it, then. > > -Peff