From: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:26:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff: avoid stack-buffer-read-overrun for very long name
Message-ID: <87y5piwjay.fsf@rho.meyering.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKPyHN1mFGiZd7dDH-stUmr3H1JHwxcP1DkjCYNXZd6Bt-P7+w@mail.gmail.com>

Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 18:13, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> writes:
>>
>>> What do you think about replacing those two append-if-needed two-liners:
>>>
>>>     if (buffer2.len && buffer2.buf[buffer2.len - 1] != '/')
>>>             strbuf_addch(&buffer2, '/');
>>>
>>> by something that readably encapsulates the idiom:
>>>
>>>     strbuf_append_if_absent (&buffer2, '/');
>>>
>>> (though the name isn't particularly apt, because you might
>>> take "absent" to mean "not anywhere in the string," so maybe
>>>   strbuf_append_if_not_already_at_end (ugly) or
>>>   strbuf_append_uniq
>>> )
>>
>> I am not good at names, but strbuf_terminate_with(&buffer2, '/')
>> perhaps?
>
> strbuf_ensure_terminator(struct strbuf* buf, int term, int always)?

Nice!  So far, that's the name I prefer.
But why the third parameter?