From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 21:06:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] document & test fetch pruning & add fetch.pruneTags
Message-ID: <87y3k1lvom.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlgg3qn3l.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>


On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Junio C. Hamano jotted:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 08 2018, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason jotted:
>>
>>> As noted in my 87h8quytmq.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com there was a bug I
>>> noticed in v3 where it would segfault on some git-fetch invocations,
>>> but there were not tests anywhere that caught that.
>>
>> ...and of course this whole submission this time around should be v4,
>> not v2, but I didn't notice that I didn't adjust the subject prefix
>> before sending. Junio: Hopefully you can pick it up anyway without too
>> much trouble, sorry.
>>
>> FWIW I've deployed this to production @ work to some tens of k of
>> machines (low "k" of which have users using git) without any issues.
>
> Will replace.  I found that the resolution of conflicts necessary
> with the jh/partial-clone topic is a bit different from the previous
> version due to addition of an extra parameter to fetch_one(), and I
> think I didn't botch it, but please double check when I push the
> results out in a few hours.

Thanks. FWIW I've looked over that resolution in pu and it LGTM.