From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:32:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 42/45] add tests for rebasing merged history
Message-ID: <87obbfchqb.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s30YkE5i7B==pyB8zkNxu=YoGvP1=V_2LqOe_frXV+cfQ@mail.gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> +#TODO: make order consistent across all flavors of rebase
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' ''
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd e n o' -m
>>> +test_run_rebase success 'd n o e' -i
>>
>> [45/45] would seem to imply that these tests fail as of this patch.  Is
>> that correct?
>>
>> If so, please either squash that change or move the test further up
>> marked as 'failure'.
>
> I won't. The whole purpose of the last patch is to show these tests are fixed.
>
> Martin von Zweigbergk's patch series is independent of this one, I
> merely added it to show the above.

So you would deliberately break a bisection on this test file?

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch