From: Sergey Organov Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:46:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] diff-merges: clarify log.diffMerges documentation Message-ID: <87leqjjuu9.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > Sergey Organov writes: > >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov >> --- >> Documentation/config/log.txt | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/config/log.txt b/Documentation/config/log.txt >> index 5250ba45fb4e..cbe34d759221 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/config/log.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/config/log.txt >> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ log.excludeDecoration:: >> option. >> >> log.diffMerges:: >> - Set default diff format to be used for merge commits. See >> - `--diff-merges` in linkgit:git-log[1] for details. >> - Defaults to `separate`. >> + Set diff format to be used when `--diff-merges=on` is >> + specified, see `--diff-merges` in linkgit:git-log[1] for >> + details. Defaults to `separate`. >> >> log.follow:: >> If `true`, `git log` will act as if the `--follow` option was used when > > Is the reason why the patch drops "default" because the value given > is used only when --diff-merges=on is given, and does not kick in > when "--diff-merges=" is explicitly given? Yes, exactly. It's the --diff-merges=on that uses the default diff format. Well, in fact "-m" uses it as well, being a synonym for --diff-merges=on, so we might consider to mention "-m" here as well, but I thought it's not needed as we provide a link to corresponding piece of documentation already. I wanted to explicitly describe what log.diffMerges affects, instead of vague "default diff format" term causing a need to figure what in fact it means. Thanks, -- Sergey Organov