From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:34:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cache_tree_find(): remove redundant checks
Message-ID: <87ha7ei75s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <5315A974.5000104@alum.mit.edu>

Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> BTW, I purposely didn't use a "for" loop at the end (even though I
> usually like them) because I wanted to keep it prominent that path is
> being updated to the value of slash.  Putting that assignment in a for
> loop makes it easy to overlook because it puts "path" in the spot that
> usually holds an inconsequential iteration variable.

Reasonable.

-- 
David Kastrup