From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:55:15 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2013, #01; Thu, 1)
Message-ID: <87a9kz3uy4.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vbo5hqe6r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> * tr/log-full-diff-keep-true-parents (2013-08-01) 1 commit
>  - log: use true parents for diff even when rewriting
>
>  Output from "git log --full-diff -- <pathspec>" looked strange,
>  because comparison was done with the previous ancestor that touched
>  the specified <pathspec>, causing the patches for paths outside the
>  pathspec to show more than the single commit has changed.
>
>  I am not sure if that is necessarily a problem, though.  Output
>  from "git log --full-diff -2 -- <pathspec>" without this change
>  will be applicable to some codebase, but after this change that
>  will no longer be true (you will get only tiny parts of the change
>  that were made by the two commits in question, while missing all
>  the other changes).

Hmm.  Uwe's original complaint was that --stat -- as in "what other
things are touched when we modify foo" -- is nonsensical.

In addition, applying what you describe above would be a very strange
form of rebase: one that squashes everything into the commits that
affect the given files.  When would it ever make sense to do such
squashing?  After all, you'd lose all the commit splits&messages in
between.

If you care about it, I can introduce a new flag that lets the user
pick; it's pretty trivial.  But it seems very strange to me.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch