From: Thomas Rast
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:10:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] l10n: de.po: translate 68 new messages
Message-ID: <877gchu66x.fsf@thomasrast.ch>
In-Reply-To: <1383942139-10536-1-git-send-email-ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Ralf Thielow writes:
> #: remote.c:1837
> -#, fuzzy
> msgid " (use \"git branch --unset-upstream\" to fixup)\n"
> -msgstr " git branch --set-upstream-to %s\n"
> +msgstr " (benutzen Sie \"git branch --unset-upstream\" zum Beheben)\n"
Minor nit: the indent (it's simply a continuation indent for the "your
upstream is gone" message) is not consistent with other continuation
indents in the same vein, e.g.
#: remote.c:1794
msgid " (use \"git push\" to publish your local commits)\n"
msgstr " (benutzen Sie \"git push\" um lokale Commits zu publizieren)\n"
> #. Maybe the user already did that, don't error out here
> #: submodule.c:76
> -#, fuzzy, c-format
> +#, c-format
> msgid "Could not update .gitmodules entry %s"
> -msgstr "Konnte git-Verweis %s nicht erstellen"
> +msgstr "Konnte Eintrag '%s' in .gitmodules nicht aktualisieren"
>
> #. Maybe the user already did that, don't error out here
> #: submodule.c:109
> -#, fuzzy, c-format
> +#, c-format
> msgid "Could not remove .gitmodules entry for %s"
> -msgstr "Konnte Sektion '%s' nicht aus Konfiguration entfernen"
> +msgstr "Konnte Sektion '%s' nicht aus .gitmodules entfernen"
Here you translate 'entry' once as Eintrag, and once as Sektion? Is the
latter just a mistake from the fuzzy translation?
> #: builtin/gc.c:265
> msgid "force running gc even if there may be another gc running"
> -msgstr ""
> +msgstr "erzwingt Ausführung des Garbage Collectors selbst wenn ein anderer\n"
> +"Gargabe Collector bereits ausgeführt wird"
>
> #: builtin/gc.c:305
> #, c-format
> @@ -5502,6 +5493,8 @@ msgstr ""
> msgid ""
> "gc is already running on machine '%s' pid % (use --force if not)"
> msgstr ""
> +"Gargabe Collector wird bereits auf Maschine '%s' pid % ausgeführt\n"
> +"(benutzen Sie --force falls nicht)"
According to the glossary:
When a message is referring to the command, e.g. in error messages, we
do not translate the term.
Isn't this an instance of this rule? You could translate gc to git-gc
to avoid some confusion, but I think it specifically refers to running
the command.
> #: builtin/repack.c:143
> -#, fuzzy
> msgid "pack everything in a single pack"
> -msgstr "packt alles"
> +msgstr "packt alles in ein einzelnes Paket"
"ein einziges Paket" -- or is that my Swiss German again?
Also, the glossary says pack -> Pack-Datei. So it'd end up at "eine
einzige Pack-Datei".
> #: builtin/repack.c:145
> -#, fuzzy
> msgid "same as -a, and turn unreachable objects loose"
> -msgstr "zeigt unerreichbare Objekte"
> +msgstr "genau wie -a, unerreichbare Objekte werden aber nicht gelöscht"
Clever :-)
> #: builtin/repack.c:150
> msgid "pass --no-reuse-delta to git-pack-objects"
> -msgstr ""
> +msgstr "übergibt --no-reuse-delta nach git-pack-objects"
>
> #: builtin/repack.c:152
> msgid "pass --no-reuse-object to git-pack-objects"
> -msgstr ""
> +msgstr "übergibt --no-reuse-object nach git-pack-objects"
>
> #: builtin/repack.c:157
> msgid "pass --local to git-pack-objects"
> -msgstr ""
> +msgstr "übergibt --local nach git-pack-objects"
s/nach/an/?
> #: builtin/repack.c:158
> msgid "approxidate"
> -msgstr ""
> +msgstr "Datumsangabe"
On an entirely different note, we don't parse German approxidates, do
we?
--
Thomas Rast
tr@thomasrast.ch