From: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:52:59 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] am: learn passing -b to mailinfo
Message-ID: <8762ghxpxw.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <7vzkdt4s9l.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> writes:
>
>> @@ -571,8 +574,8 @@ then
>>  else
>>  	utf8=-n
>>  fi
>> -if test "$(cat "$dotest/keep")" = t
>> -then
>> +keep=$(cat "$dotest/keep")
>> +if test "$keep" = t
>>  	keep=-k
>>  fi
>
> Curious.
>
> Who writes 't' to $dotest/keep after this patch is applied?

Nobody; like the commit message says, I was just trying to help users
upgrading from one version to the next in the middle of an 'am', which
almost worked except for

> I suspect that this patch was not tested in a way to exercise this
> codepath; shell would have barfed when seeing the lack of "then" here, no?

(ouch)

> I also do not want to worry about "echo" portability issues that may come
> from an existing
>
> 	echo "$keep" >"$dotest/keep"
>
> that this patch does not touch.

Good point, thanks.  I'll reroll with printf.  Should I keep the
upgrade path compatibility?

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch