From: Thomas Rast Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 22:09:26 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5510: ensure we stay in the toplevel test dir Message-ID: <871upcht2h.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> In-Reply-To: <7vipiokmrz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Junio C Hamano writes: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> The last test descended into a subdir without ever re-emerging, which >> is not so nice to the next test writer. > > True. Making the test suite more robust like this patch does is very much > appreciated. > > Is there a reason why we shouldn't be sticking to the more usual > > mkdir dups && > ( > cd dups && > do whatever in dups > ) > > pattern? None in particular. It would also perhaps reduce the churn since (as it touches every line anyway) it could be squashed with 2/4. Should I reroll? -- Thomas Rast trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch