From: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:56:44 GMT
Subject: Re: Git.pm
Message-ID: <86likyy7ub.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB3zAY3VHtUobJfJ7=nSKb_6uJOXLGVHzR18qV6txPkzf54cDw@mail.gmail.com>

>>>>> "Subho" == Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com> writes:

Subho> I have started looking into how the error catching mechanism
Subho> implemented right now. I have looked into the more modern error
Subho> catching/throwing mechanisms in use in perl, and I am of the opinion
Subho> that Try::Simple would probably be the best candidate for being the
Subho> new error catching mechanism. I also wanted to discuss some aspects of
Subho> the changes to be made -

Try::Tiny is preferred to Try::Simple.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion