From: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 20:14:03 GMT
Subject: Re: Newbie grief
Message-ID: <86ipgdhvjo.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA2D97A.8090504@palm.com>

>>>>> "Rich" == Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com> writes:

Rich> Corporate mandate.  Political decision made without discussion
Rich> with the people who would be using it.

Sounds like you put two strikes against git before you even invoked the
first command, with that attitude.

If you are *serious* about having *git* work for you, it will.
Thousands of projects are using git every day.

But if you're looking at git like "it's not hg, and I already hate
that", you'll end up sounding like you have in the past few days.

Methinks *this* is the actual problem.  Not git.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion