From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:49:11 GMT
Subject: Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.
Message-ID: <85d4uux5lk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710312111170.4362@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:
>
>> Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this 
>> patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced 
>> me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?
>
> Isn't that obvious?  To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit.

The commit would not change anything, so what is there to lose?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum