From: Erik Bågfors Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:13:22 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <845b6e870610211713m413afd28tcdf24934df25d3f5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 10/22/06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > And that work-flow is definitely not "distributed" it's much closer to > > "disconnected centralized". > > Side note: the only reason I think that distinction is worth making at all > is when comparing git to bzr, and even then this is a fairly subtle > distinction, and probably not a huge deal in practice. > > I obviously think git is a nicer distributed design, but in the end, if > you compare to something like CVS or SVN that isn't even disconnected, the > difference between git and bzr in this sense is basically zero. > > So I sound like I care, but at the same time, I realize very well that > when coming from a totally centralized world, the details we're arguing > are _so_ not important. I have to agree. Personally I think both git, bzr and mercurial are all VERY nice systems. If they weren't all started about the same time, I doubt we would have all three. I am happy to use either, but I have a small preference with bzr because it suites me. I'm saying this, just as a user, nothing else. /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com