From: Erik Bågfors Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:19:54 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <845b6e870610210919i6d086654g3881343e6a3c9f84@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 10/21/06, Sean wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:13:28 +0200 > Jan Hudec wrote: > > > Bzr is meant to be used in both ways, depending on user's choice. > > Therefore it comes with that infrastructure and you can choose whether > > you want to use it or not. > > From what we've read on this thread, bzr appears to be biased towards > working with a central repo. That is the model that supports the use of > revnos etc that the bzr folks are so fond of. However Git is perfectly > capable of being used in any number of models, including centralized. > Git just doesn't make the mistake of training new users into using > features that are only stable in a limited number of those models. This is just plain wrong. bzr is a fully decentralized VCS. I've read this thread for quite some time now and I really cannot understand why people come to this conclusion. However, if you do want to work centralized, bzr has commands that fits that workflow really good. /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com