From: Hannu Koivisto <azure@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:34:30 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Windows: Skip fstat/lstat optimization in write_entry()
Message-ID: <83eivnh5bd.fsf@kalahari.s2.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090420110302.GB25059@dpotapov.dyndns.org>

Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> writes:

> The cygwin version has the same problem. (In fact, it is even worse,
> because we have an optimized version for lstat/stat but not for fstat,
> and they return different values for some fields like i_no). But even
> if we used the only Cygwin functions, we would still face the problem,
> because Windows returns the wrong values for timestamps (and maybe
> even size on FAT?). So I think the following patch should be squashed
> on top.

I can verify that this fixes the rebase problem I've been having in
Cygwin and that I just mailed about separately.

-- 
Hannu