From: Alex Riesen Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:42:15 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix the remote note the fetch-tool prints after storing a fetched reference Message-ID: <81b0412b0706060142h2df41f11pa0157a360831736@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7v3b157b4j.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> On 6/6/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Alex Riesen" writes: > > > Otherwise ".git" is removed from every remote name which has it: > > > > $ git fetch -v > > * refs/heads/origin: same as branch 'master' of /home/user/linux > > commit: 5ecd310 > > $ ls /home/user/linux > > ls: /home/user/linux: No such file or directory > > $ ls /home/user/linux.git > > HEAD objects packed-refs ... > > I suspect the above misses the point. Depends on the point. I mean to say: the path in the output of the command does not exist anywhere. > The test "ls /home/user/linux" is not relevant. Ability to say > "git fetch /home/user/linux" is. This is still ambiguous: $ git fetch -v /home/user/a * fetched /home/user/a commit: b85c140 $ git fetch -v /home/user/a.git * fetched /home/user/a commit: b85c140 Which one was fetched when? /home/user/a or /home/user/a.git? No imagine you don't see the command (as if git fetch is called in some frontend). Would you be able to distinguish the sources? Besides, I just noticed git-clone is broken WRT the .git as well: I can clone a "a.git" into "b" (and it ignores -l and -s!), but I can't fetch the "a" (aka "origin") being in "b". And of course, "origin" in "b" is setup as "/path/a", not "/path/a.git".