From: Alex Riesen Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:58:02 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added make options NO_GUI and WITH_P4IMPORT. Message-ID: <81b0412b0703210758v32e7a692p426f45de9ee6db42@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070321144210.GF14837@codelabs.ru> On 3/21/07, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:38:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > >> I am happening to develop on some machines on which I have no > > >> X-Windows or any GUI providers at all, so I prefer not to have the > > >> Tcl/Tk dependency at all. > > > > > > If you don't do something, it is often interesting to state why: if you > > > don't install something to prevent a dependency you don't want to have, it > > > is different from saying that you do not want to have a GUI, _even if_ the > > > dependency is there already. > > > > I read his message as "these are useless for me, so why introduce a > > useless dependency?" The "effect" is to have no Tcl dependence, > > but the original reason is to have no GUI. > > Yep, you're right. That was I meant originally. How do you feel > about NO_GUI or NO_TCL names? That'd be NO_TCL_TK. TCL has nothing to do with graphics. And you have one more supporter for NO_GUI (my server has no usable graphics, will never have and runs cron jobs with git in them).