From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:06:42 GMT
Subject: Re: diff machinery cleanup
Message-ID: <7vzmecv7tp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060810103836.GA1317@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> OK, doing a discard_cache() between the call to run_diff_index and
> run_diff_files seems to clear up the problem. But if I understand
> correctly, are you saying that run_diff_index has munged the index on
> disk, and I really need to be poking at a temporary copy? If so, why
> isn't that a problem when running (e.g.) "git-diff-index; git-ls-files"?

No, run_diff_index munges the index in-core, and it does not
writes it out for obvious reasons.

Some of the "interrogation commands" do munge the index without
writing it out because that is the easiest/cleanest way to
implement what they do.  ls-files does it to filter by paths,
for example.

> That does sound the cleanest, and it would enable a more useful status
> message, as you mentioned before. What caused you to stop working on it?
> Infeasible, or simply more infeasible than you would like right now?

Finding out somebody was already working on it?