From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 16:54:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix segfault in merge-recursive Message-ID: <7vzldm6wu1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Dave O writes: > Once again, I don't really know what the implications of the index > operations that are happening here are, but the update_stages() call > in a recursive merge must be doing surprising. When you are trying to come up with the final result (i.e. depth=0), you want to record how the conflict arose by registering the state of the common ancestor, your branch and the other branch in the index, hence you want to do update_stages(). When you are merging with positive depth, that is because of a criss-cross merge situation. In such a case, you would need to record the tentative result, with conflict markers and all as if the merge went cleanly, even if there are conflicts, in order to write it out as a tree object later to be used as a common ancestor tree. update_file() calls update_file_flags() with update_cache=1 to signal that the result needs to be written to the index at stage #0 (i.e. merged), and the code should not clobber the index further by calling update_stages(). Your patch looks correct. Thanks.