From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 03:47:26 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --info-path and --man-path options to git. Message-ID: <7vzkn5pxv5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110502002535.GE11550@elie> Jonathan Nieder writes: > I am still not very happy about it. The man browser is in a much > better position to help: the default MANPATH (at least under Debian; > see manpath(5)[1]) is generated by mapping $PATH entries on the fly, and > it seems like only an oversight that it deals with directories under > /usr but not /home. And it does not thrill me that we would be > training people that > > git help git > > will cover for the installer's mistakes, while the more conventional > > man git > > mechanism (which is also used for other programs installed to $HOME) > will not. Well, is there anything I can do to help your unhappiness about that? Where is your unhappiness coming from? Is this your argument? 'git help' allows distros' oversight with its -m and -i options; it discourages distros to get their act together. I personally do not think punishing users of distros by not helping would be an effective way to encourage distros to help their users, so even though I kind of agree with that statement, I wouldn't conclude that with "therefore, git shouldn't try to be helpful with 'help [-m|-i]'".