From: Junio C Hamano Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:53:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] teach sha1_name to look in graveyard reflogs Message-ID: <7vzk6rplfk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20120720155341.GD2862@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > But what _should_ it show for such an entry? There is no commit to show > in the reflog walker, but it would still be nice to say "BTW, there was > a deletion even here". Obviously just skipping it and showing the next > entry would be better than the current behavior of stopping the > traversal, but I feel like there must be some better behavior. Like showing an entry that says "Ref deleted here", which should be easy to do by creating a phoney commit object and inserting it to the queue the reflog walker uses, I would guess.