From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:28:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] documentation: add git transport security notice
Message-ID: <7vy59z5ej9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130624215733.GU2457@bacardi.hollandpark.frase.id.au>

Fraser Tweedale <frase@frase.id.au> writes:

> Junio, do you prefer the following more generic wording?  If so I
> will re-roll the patch (also note s/protocol/transport/ which is
> more appropriate, I think).
>
>  The git transport is insecure and should be used with caution on
>  unsecured networks.

Generic but I somehow find it overly vague (it is unclear what kind
of "insecure-ness" it is talking about).

  Because the git transport does not do any authentication, it
  should be used with caution on unsecured networks.

Perhaps?