From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 17:23:34 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] cat-file --batch-check performance improvements Message-ID: <7vy59blmjt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130712061533.GA11297@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > The results for running (in linux.git): > > $ git rev-list --objects --all >objects > $ git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' /dev/null I can see how these patches are very logical avenue to grab only on-disk footprint for large number of objects, but among the type, payload size and on-disk footprint, I find it highly narrow niche that a real user or script is interested _only_ in on-disk footprint without even worrying about the type of object. > ... (though I think the result actually cleans up the > sha1_object_info_extended interface a bit, and is worth it). I tend to agree, especially eyeballing the result of 7/7. Thanks.